**EXTRA! THE LATEST NEWS FROM THE ACLS**=20
=20
=20
ACLS OPENS COMPETITION FOR DIGITAL INNOVATION FELLOWSHIP PROGRAM
=20
The American Council of Learned Societies (ACLS) is pleased to announce
its new Digital Innovation Fellowship program, in support of digitally
based research projects in the humanities and humanistic social
sciences. These fellowships, created with the generous help of The
Andrew W. Mellon Foundation, are intended to support an academic year
dedicated to work on a major scholarly project of a digital character
that advances humanistic studies and best exemplifies the integration of
such research with use of computing, networking, and other information
technology-based tools. The online application for the fellowship
program is located at http://ofa.acls.org <http://ofa.acls.org/> ;
applications must be completed by November 10, 2005 (decisions to be
announced in late March 2006).
=20
This is the first national fellowship program to recognize and reward
humanistic scholarship in the digital sphere, and to help establish
standards for judging the quality, innovation, and utility of such
research. Many scholars have been working in the humanities for years
with such tools as digital research archives, new media representations
of extant data, and innovative databases-and now the ACLS sees an
important opportunity to start identifying and providing incentive for
distinctive work, on a national basis. "Information technology can be
the means for scholars to answer new and old questions that have so far
resisted our curiosity and our effort. This program will support a
rising generation of scholars in making exactly that kind of progress,"
says James O'Donnell, provost of Georgetown University, Chair of the
ACLS Executive Committee of Delegates, and author of Avatars of the
Word: From Papyrus to Cyberspace (1998).
=20
Up to five Digital Innovation Fellowships will be awarded in this
competition year, for tenure beginning in 2006-2007. As this program
aims to provide the means for pursuing digitally-based scholarly
projects, the fellowship includes a stipend of up to $55,000 to allow an
academic year's leave from teaching, as well as project funds of up to
$25,000 for purposes such as access to tools and personnel for digital
production, collaborative work with other scholars and with humanities
or computing research centers, and the dissemination and preservation of
projects.
=20
The ACLS criteria for judging applications include the project's
intellectual ambitions and technological underpinnings, likely
contribution as a digital scholarly work to humanistic study,
satisfaction of technical requirements for a successful research
project, degree and significance of preliminary work; potential for
promoting teamwork and collaboration (where appropriate), and
articulation with local infrastructure at the applicant's home
institution.
=20
Applicants must be citizens or permanent residents of the United States
as of the application deadline date and must hold a Ph.D. degree
conferred prior to the application deadline. However, established
scholars who can demonstrate the equivalent of the Ph.D. in publications
and professional experience may also qualify.
=20
=20
Applications for the 2005-06 ACLS Digital Innovation Fellowship Program
Deadline: November 10, 2005
Contact: American Council of Learned Societies, 633 Third Avenue, New
York, NY 10017
Phone: (212) 697-1505
E-mail: sfisher(a)acls.org
Web: www.acls.org/difguide.htm
Hi,
There used to be a very good (free) dtd and schema generator at
http://www.hitsw.com/xml_utilites/. This site allowed you to upload an
xml file and produce a rough Document Type Definition (dtd) or Schema
file that was suitable for tweaking. I used it as recently as this past
April, but it doesn't seem to be there any more. Does anybody know of an
equivalent?
--
Daniel Paul O'Donnell <daniel.odonnell(a)uleth.ca>
University of Lethbridge
Call For Papers: International Medieval Congress 2006, Leeds
Digital Medievalist
Abstract Submission Deadline: 1 September, 2005
The Digital Medievalist project invites abstracts to be submitted
for 20 minute papers to be delivered in either of two sessions at
the thirteenth International Medieval Congress which will take place
in Leeds, UK, from 10-13 July 2006.
Session Abstracts:
Digital Medievalist General Session: Electronic Surrogates
The general session investigates any use of digital technology in
Medieval Studies, but especially concentrates on the formulation of
best practice in digital resource creation, particularly the
problems and possibilities of electronic 'surrogates' (e.g. electronic
representations of primary material, including but not limited to
editions, facsimiles, databases) in researching the Middle Ages.
Digital Medievalist Specific Session: Text vs Data
The specific session focuses on the nature of textual data in electronic
editions. Are there fundamental differences between primary source text
when it is seen as text and when it is seen as data (e.g. in a textual
database)? What are the benefits and drawbacks of one over the other?
How do the differences affect our research with electronic media?
To submit proposals for either of these sessions please fill out the
online form available at http://purl.org/cummings/DM-Leeds2006.html
before 1 September, 2005.
--James Cummings
Digital Medievalist Project.
www.digitalmedievalist.org
Hi all,
I'm writing to encourage members of the list to add to Wiki entries
anything useful or interesting they see on, receive from, or contribute
to the list. To name some recent examples: if you are the member of a
project, institute or organisation, please consider adding a brief
profile (see http://sql.uleth.ca/dmorgwiki/index.php/Projects for other
examples); if you know or learn of a special font or tool, consider
adding a page about it or adding to a relevant existing entry; if you
see a term or acronym you didn't understand, consider adding an entry on
it once you know what it means.
Adding to the Wiki is really quite a quick and simple process
(especially after you've tried once) and it is difficult for much to go
wrong: we can undo any changes (you can do so yourself), and a couple of
us keep track of all changes to the wiki to look for formatting errors,
etc. we can repair.
The goal here is not to add a burden to posters to the list (we are all
busy people and don't necessarily have the time to answer questions
twice). But the Wiki is in some ways intended to serve as the collective
intelligence of the community. Just as on other lists, poster often post
summaries of replies they receive to questions, on this list, you can
post answers to the Wiki.
Any attention you can devote to this, is very much appreciated.
-d
--
Dr. Daniel Paul O'Donnell
Associate Professor of English
Director, Digital Medievalist Project
University of Lethbridge
Lethbridge AB T1K 3M4
vox: +1 (403) 329-2377
fax: +1 (403) 382-7191
URL: http://people.uleth.ca/~daniel.odonnell/
Digital Medievalist Project: http://www.digitalmedievalist.org/
(@wiglaf)
I can now say with a fair amount of confidence that the next version of
Junicode, 0.6.5, is in stable condition. That is, it installs correctly
under Windows, Linux and the latest version of OS X, and all the
programming works, to the extent that I have been able to test it. Get
it at this URL:
http://www.engl.virginia.edu/OE/junicode/junicode.html
Click the "Beta" link at the very bottom. I will not promote this to
official release status until I have brought the documentation up to
date, but the fonts themselves should not change.
As has generally been the case, the Regular style is much fuller than
the bold, italic, and bold italic. When I get urgent requests for bold
or italic characters to match the regular ones, I do try to comply.
Many thanks to Mark Stansbury for stress-testing under OS X.
Peter Baker
Hi there,
Responding to Dieter's post below: first I'd like
to thank you for your XDOM libraries, which I'm
beginning to use for some of my Delphi projects. Great work!
I agree that scholars currently have little to
gain from developing tools, from the point of
view of their academic careers. However, there's
another group of individuals like me, who are
working in the academic context as programmers
and in similar roles, who do this kind of work
for a living. John Bradley would be another good
example. Our work initially got going in the
realm of language teaching support
(Computer-Assisted Language Learning), giving
birth to quite widely-used tools such as our Hot
Potatoes programs; recently, we've morphed from a
Language Centre into a Humanities Computing and
Media Centre, and our work is focused more and
more on HC, digital documents and encoding. Our
experience has been that when we release tools
which gain approval and acceptance, the
university is generally pleased and appreciative;
they've also helped us spin off some of our work
commercially, to everyone's financial benefit.
While individual departments and tenure
committees may not (yet) give much weight to this
kind of work, other parts of the university
administration are more supportive.
The emergence of centres such as ours, which have
relatively stable workforces (as opposed to the
ad-hoc temporary hires associated with
grant-supported projects) means that tools tend
to be rewritten and updated steadily, which gives
them more credibility (Hot Potatoes is now at
version 6, for example, and has been out since
1997). This model of tool development, where a
centre with long-term staff creates tools for the
use of several projects, and maintains them over
time, is much more likely to be successful than
the case where an academic working on a
temporarily-funded project hires in programmers
to write something for a specific purpose,
releases it, then moves on to the next piece of
research, leaving the code to languish like an
abandoned vehicle in a field (which is what
"open-sourcing" a project often turns out to mean).
Cheers,
Martin
At 09:37 AM 29/06/2005, you wrote:
>Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2005 13:14:24 +0200
>From: Dieter K?hler <d.k(a)philo.de>
>Subject: [dm-l] Tools for humanities computing (WAS: Are markup
> languages obsolete?)
>To: dm-l(a)uleth.ca
>Message-ID: <5.2.1.1.0.20050624114827.025b2050(a)pop3.philo.de>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; format=flowed
>
>I often think that the free "tools" aspect had been underestimated in
>humanities computing. Of course, there exist a couple of good examples like
>the TEI XSLT style sheets or some open source archival software etc.
>Nevertheless, the situation is not satisfactory and I wonder what are its
>causes and by which means it could possibly be improved. Briefly
>summarized the main causes, I can think of, are the following:
>
>- Most software development in the humanities takes place in an ad hoc
>fashion: People have specific problems and develop specific solutions.
>- There is a lack of institutional support for developing tools for others.
>Tools are only by-products.
>- If there is institutional support for developing tools for others, these
>tools need to be sold in order to re-finance the work.
>- It is not advisable for a scholar trying to build an academic career on
>developing tools for humanities computing.
>- There exists no academic infrastructure *focused* on developing tools for
>the humanities, ie. a specific society, journal and annual conference.
>
>Since one of my main research interests is considered with the development
>of tools for humanities computing, I would be very interested in the
>opinions of others on the above list of causes. Perhaps together we could
>find ways to improve the situation.
>
>Dieter Köhler
>
>Institute of Philosophy and
>Centre for Multimedia Studies
>University of Karlsruhe
>Germany
______________________________________
Martin Holmes
University of Victoria Humanities Computing and Media Centre
mholmes(a)uvic.ca
martin(a)mholmes.com
mholmes(a)halfbakedsoftware.com
http://www.mholmes.comhttp://web.uvic.ca/hcmc/http://www.halfbakedsoftware.com