Dear all,
I have a question about what tools and techniques people are using for
data mining in medieval studies, especially for authorship attribution
and scribal identification. If you use them then which systems do you
use? How do you verify the results? Do you trust the system to work
and not simply to reproduce your own views? If you don't use these
systems then why not? I'm thinking of a recent article in LLC 23
(2008) by Sculley and Pasanek which seems to me to raise some
…
[View More]important questions about the validity of data mining, but I'm also
asking as a designer myself. If I'm producing software for scribal
identification or authorship attribution, what can I do (if anything)
that will convince you to use and trust my system?
Peter
--
Dr Peter Stokes
Leverhulme Early Career Fellow
Dept. of Anglo-Saxon, Norse and Celtic
The University of Cambridge
9 West Rd, Cambridge, CB3 9DP
Tel: +44 1223 767314
Fax: +44 1223 335092
[View Less]
[from Digital Classicist, apologies for cross-posting]
We should like to let you know about a two-day seminar, 'Object,
Artifact and Script: digital approaches to inscribed surfaces', to be
held at the e-Science Institute in Edinburgh on (Thursday and Friday)
8-9 October, 2009. (Programme will be posted at
http://www.nesc.ac.uk/esi/events/1014/ .)
The event description follows:
The text upon an object is both evidence for and part of its form and
therefore its function; just as the …
[View More]construction and purpose of an
object gives context to and aids in the interpretation of text. Indeed,
the form of an object effects the placement and design of text and
decoration upon it. Non-verbal decorations drawn or painted on an object
fall somewhere between (2-D) text and (3-D) physical object: like the
text they are added by the scribe or artist, they have semantic (if not
verbal) connotation, and are often taken out of the material context of
the object; like the object, however, they are considered as artistic
and visual content, and are hard to digitize meaningfully. Nevertheless
they sometimes come closest to crossing the artificial boundary and may
be studied by both philologists and archaeologists. Text may also be
constrained by the placement of decoration on a surface, or vice versa.
This conference will bring together scholars from a variety of fields
who study objects and texts side by side to discuss the ways in which
advanced computer science methods can enhance both their own work and
the nature of their collaborations with other researchers working on the
same objects.
Methods to be considered will include (but need not be restricted to):
* Linking/connecting text and images of objects within digital
editions/projects, or making object description an intrinsic part of a
text edition;
* Advanced imaging (3D surface scanning, multi-spectral imaging,
non-invasive volumetric scanning, stereographic/photogrammetric imaging)
to bring lost or damaged text/engraving out of objects;
* Automated text/character analysis; identification of text
fields/columns/lines;
* Reconstruction and visualization of damaged, unclear or complex
text-bearing objects;
* Digital placing of objects in historical and archaeological contexts
to highlight textual/non-textual features.
If you are interested in attending this event, please register on the
eSI website, and confirmation will be sent you as soon as possible.
Regards,
Gabriel Bodard
Stuart Dunn
--
Dr Gabriel BODARD
(Epigrapher & Digital Classicist)
Centre for Computing in the Humanities
King's College London
26-29 Drury Lane
London WC2B 5RL
Email: gabriel.bodard(a)kcl.ac.uk
Tel: +44 (0)20 7848 1388
Fax: +44 (0)20 7848 2980
http://www.digitalclassicist.org/http://www.currentepigraphy.org/
--
*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
Dot Porter (MA, MSLS) Metadata Manager
Digital Humanities Observatory (RIA), Regus House, 28-32 Upper
Pembroke Street, Dublin 2, Ireland
-- A Project of the Royal Irish Academy --
Phone: +353 1 234 2444 Fax: +353 1 234 2400
http://dho.ie Email: dot.porter(a)gmail.com
*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
[View Less]
-----Original Message-----
From: apilist-bounces(a)cnrs-orleans.fr [mailto:apilist-bounces@cnrs-orleans.fr] On Behalf Of Denis Muzerelle
Sent: 16 September 2009 17:33
To: APILIST
Subject: [Apilist] Digital Middle Ages conference June 16-17 2010
Please find attached hereto the call for papers for
THIRD INTERNATIONAL MARGOT CONFERENCE
THE DIGITAL MIDDLE AGES:
TEACHING AND RESEARCH
JUNE 16-17, 2010
BARNARD COLLEGE, COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY
NEW YORK, USA
Note that the proposed subjects include in …
[View More]particular:
- Digital palaeography
- Encoding of medieval manuscripts
D.M.
-- Denis MUZERELLE
Resp. de la section "Paléographie latine"
Institut de recherche et d'histoire des textes (CNRS) 40, av. d'Iéna, F-75116 Paris
--
Dr. des. Malte Rehbein
Universität Würzburg
Lehrstuhl für Computerphilologie und Neuere Deutsche Literaturgeschichte
Philosophiegebäude 8/E/14
Am Hubland
97074 Würzburg
fon +49.(0)931.31.88773
email malte.rehbein(a)uni-wuerzburg.de
web http://www.denkstaette.de
[View Less]
Hi all,
For a grant application, I need to submit quotes on field laser
scanning. We need to scan the Bewcastle, Ruthwell, and perhaps Brussels
crosses to a very high degree of detail. Ruthwell is in a church,
Bewcastle exposed in a field, and Brussels in a cathedral treasury.
Ruthwell and Bewcastle are stone and around 15 feet tall; Brussels is
partially gilt, and a couple of feet tall at most.
In the past we've used Archaeoptics, but my understanding is that they
are now defunct. We …
[View More]also have had quotes from the CNS in Pisa. Does
anybody have other recommendations? Obviously vendors in the U.K. would
be obvious choices, but our experience is that the travel costs are not
the largest part of the expense and that vendors on the continent can
compete with British vendors quite well.
I greatly appreciate any suggestions!
--
Daniel Paul O'Donnell
Associate Professor of English
University of Lethbridge
Chair and CEO, Text Encoding Initiative (http://www.tei-c.org/)
Co-Chair, Digital Initiatives Advisory Board, Medieval Academy of America
President-elect (English), Society for Digital Humanities/Société pour l'étude des médias interactifs (http://sdh-semi.org/)
Founding Director (2003-2009), Digital Medievalist Project (http://www.digitalmedievalist.org/)
Vox: +1 403 329-2377
Fax: +1 403 382-7191 (non-confidental)
Home Page: http://people.uleth.ca/~daniel.odonnell/
[View Less]
Thank you Francesco!
STELLA FRANCESCO VINCENZO a écrit :
> Dear Marjorie,
> as far as I know, the best tools for non-semantic lexicometry are on the
> portal "TAPoR", a development of the old TACT software. Less advanced
> concordance-programs are to be found on the web (f.e. Concapp and many
> others). Wordsmith (with restricted access, but there is a free trial
> version) is also good. I find also still useful "Analisi Lessicale", a very
> old tool based on Access, …
[View More]which works quite good on Latin texts:
> http://www.funsci.com/fun3_it/lessico/manuale.htm. As for the methodology
> about ancient literatures, you can consult a provisional version of an
> experiment on the Epistolae duorum amantium with further bibliography at
> http://www.tdtc.unisi.it/files/materiale_didattico/stella/EDA-Statistiche%2….
>
> Best wishes
>
> Francesco Stella
>
>
> On Mon, 14 Sep 2009 16:00:18 +0200, Marjorie Burghart
> <marjorie.burghart(a)ehess.fr> wrote:
>
>> Hello list!
>>
>> I have to confess that, unlike many digital medievalists and humanists,
>> I am neither a linguist nor a lexicographer... Although, I have long
>> been tempted to use lexicographic tools on my sources (for the records,
>> latin homiletic literature). I am particularly interested in
>> cooccurrences, techniques of authorship attribution, and automatic
>> identification of "borrowed" spans of text, for instance. The problem is
>> I feel a bit clueless / helpless when it comes to put things into gear...
>>
>> Would any of you have already gone the same way, and could direct me to
>> some introduction accessible to non-linguists, and maybe to some
>> lexicometry softwares? I am particularly interested in softwares that
>> would be able to deal "intelligently" with Latin (most of them seem to
>> handle very nicely contemporary, widespread languages like English, but
>> I haven't seen any specializing in Latin).
>>
>> Thanks!
>> M.
>>
--
Marjorie BURGHART
EHESS (pôle de Lyon) / UMR 5648
Histoire et Archéologie des Mondes Chrétiens et Musulmans Médiévaux
18 quai Claude Bernard
69007 Lyon - FRANCE
[View Less]