Dot, what a very good job! I am only a bit surprised that we are not making steady progress towards some goal -- that's not really the wqy human beings do things -- but it is a litttle disconcerting to think that while more and more people are doing digital or difitized editions (I agree with that very ueful distinction), users of editions seem ro remain happy with print. If I were younger (I was there at Hoyt's PP/SEENET paper). I might try to think of some kind of campaign, but perhaps it's best to let things develop as they will ?

On Mar 13, 2013, at 3:01 PM, Dot Porter <dot.porter@gmail.com> wrote:

My article looking at how medievalists use and consider digital editions has just been published in Scholarly Editing: The Annual of the Association for Documentary Editing. It may be of some interest to folks on the list (and constructive criticism, directly to me to to the list, is most welcome!)

http://www.scholarlyediting.org/2013/essays/essay.porter.html

Dot

--
*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
Dot Porter (MA, MSLS)
Digital Medievalist, Digital Librarian
Email: dot.porter@gmail.com
Personal blog: dotporterdigital.org
MESA blog: http://www.dlib.indiana.edu/projects/mesa/
MESA on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/MedievalElectronicScholarlyAlliance
*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*