I'm a developer on refdb (http://refdb.sourceforge.net/), which is not aimed at medievalists, per se, but is powerful and outputs in a variety of formats. "Cite-as-you-write" is still a bit weak (though it works well in XML). Because the outputs are XSL determined, problems like you discuss with eds. and commas are easily fixable.
It is a server based program.
-----Original Message-----
From: dm-l-bounces@uleth.ca on behalf of Toufexis Notis
Sent: Wed 28/11/2007 13:53
To: dm-l, MailList
Subject: Re: [dm-l] Bibliographical software for medievalists
Ever tried zotero? Available at http://www.zotero.org/ it lives as a
Firefox extension. It's note as versatile as a dedicated
bibliographical software but can do more then that and can prove
valuable as an overall research tool.
I am also using jabref (http://jabref.sourceforge.net/), written in
Java, open source and BibTex based. It's not exactly user friendly but
quite powerful.
Best,
Notis
On 28 Nov 2007, at 20:42, Peter Baker wrote:
> I'm wondering what bibliographical software people on this list are
> using. Last time I needed such software I used BibTeX, despite
> certain significant lacks. Now BibLaTeX looks very good. But with my
> last venture my publisher got kinda cranky about getting files in
> LaTeX, so I'm hesitant to go that route again.
>
> I've been using the Mellel word processor because of its nice
> typography, sensibly structured files and pleasant interface. I got
> Bookends to go with it for bibliographical management, but I find it
> shockingly bad--introducing stray commas in bib entries and doing
> crazy stuff like rendering authors' names as "Smith, John" but
> editors' names (when there is no author) as "John Smith." Unless I
> just haven't figured out how to use it, I think it quite unusable.
>
> So: what are the tech-savvy people on this list doing about
> bibliographical management? As medievalists we need software that
> handles edited books (with or without authors' names) gracefully,
> can handle translations, and can help with the complicated
> bibliographical situations we sometimes face in series like CCSL. It
> would be nice if it could produce a two-part bibliography ("primary
> works"/"secondary works"). For my own purposes, it would be nice if
> it ran on both the Mac and Linux, but I'd settle for Mac-only
> software if it would just work properly.
>
> Peter Baker
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Digital Medievalist Project
> Homepage: http://www.digitalmedievalist.org
> Journal (Spring 2005-): http://www.digitalmedievalist.org/journal.cfm
> RSS (announcements) server: http://www.digitalmedievalist.org/rss/rss2.cfm
> Wiki: http://sql.uleth.ca/dmorgwiki/index.php
> Change membership options: http://listserv.uleth.ca/mailman/listinfo/dm-l
> Submit RSS announcement: http://www.digitalmedievalist.org/newitem.cfm
> Contact editorial Board: digitalmedievalist@uleth.ca
> dm-l mailing list
> dm-l@uleth.ca
> http://listserv.uleth.ca/mailman/listinfo/dm-l
_______________________________________________
Digital Medievalist Project
Homepage: http://www.digitalmedievalist.org
Journal (Spring 2005-): http://www.digitalmedievalist.org/journal.cfm
RSS (announcements) server: http://www.digitalmedievalist.org/rss/rss2.cfm
Wiki: http://sql.uleth.ca/dmorgwiki/index.php
Change membership options: http://listserv.uleth.ca/mailman/listinfo/dm-l
Submit RSS announcement: http://www.digitalmedievalist.org/newitem.cfm
Contact editorial Board: digitalmedievalist@uleth.ca
dm-l mailing list
dm-l@uleth.ca
http://listserv.uleth.ca/mailman/listinfo/dm-l