I think Abdullah and James are talking about two extremes of the question I was asking.
Before posting, I took a look around and saw *graduate* humanities courses on how to use word and frontpage (which seems to me to be a misuse of resources) and on quite detailed aspects of advanced HumCom.
But what prompted the question was the sense that a conceptual, transferable understanding of things like markup, networking, database design and the like might now be as necessary as research methods are now thought to be in many places.
So many medievalists are now proposing digital projects of one kind or another. How one thinks about a new project depends to a large extent on what one already understands the possibilities to be. Since (unlike research methods) a conceptual understanding of how the magic box works is not something one can necessarily expect to pick up in the department by osmosis, my question is really whether a conceptual overview might not be increasingly essential. The focus might be different that what a CompSci or IT department would offer, since we don't need to turn everybody into a programmer; but it would be nice if more in our field had a realistic understanding of what options are available as they plan new projects.
There is BTW an article on how CompSci departments are moving away from this in today's New York Times.
-dan
Hi all,
Hope the Fall is starting out with minimal stress for everyone on the list! I have a query that I hope won't be too taxing.
A couple of years ago I came across the Manuscript Images Markup Language (MIML; http://raqoon.com/miml/index.html). It uses XML and SVG to annotate sections of digital images. I've never done anything with this, and I'm not aware of other project that have, either. Is anyone on the list familiar with MIML?
The page hasn't been updated since 2002; is this schema still worth considering?
Thanks, Dot
Did anybody give an answer to this? I confess I'd never heard of it. Anybody here from the manuscript TEI SIG? -d On Tue, 2005-30-08 at 12:24 -0400, Dot Porter wrote:
Hi all,
Hope the Fall is starting out with minimal stress for everyone on the list! I have a query that I hope won't be too taxing.
A couple of years ago I came across the Manuscript Images Markup Language (MIML; http://raqoon.com/miml/index.html). It uses XML and SVG to annotate sections of digital images. I've never done anything with this, and I'm not aware of other project that have, either. Is anyone on the list familiar with MIML?
The page hasn't been updated since 2002; is this schema still worth considering?
Thanks, Dot