Hi there,
I have recreated a much fuller, and hopefully more neutral-toned Digital Medievalist article on wikipedia at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_Medievalist and would appreciate it if anyone reading this would go and improve it. (Specifically by providing more external references, correcting the style to be even more neutral-toned and wikipedia-like, etc.)
Just thought I'd mention it in case you had a spare moment.
Best,
-James
Hi James,
This is great. I argued (unsuccessfully) a couple of years ago for the non-deletion of the original Digital Mediaevalist page in Wikipedia.
I've added a couple of tweaks. The main thing I think the wikipedians will object to, I think, is the fact that under external links you have seven links to parts of the DM website (the guidelines explicitly say not to do this: link to the front page, others can find their way to the others). I can trim these if you'd like, or we could let someone else do it to underline that this is not a sole-authored page. :)
Final point: ideally we need a nice manuscript or other mediaeval image from Wikimedia Commons to illustrate this page.
G
James Cummings a écrit :
Hi there,
I have recreated a much fuller, and hopefully more neutral-toned Digital Medievalist article on wikipedia at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_Medievalist and would appreciate it if anyone reading this would go and improve it. (Specifically by providing more external references, correcting the style to be even more neutral-toned and wikipedia-like, etc.)
Just thought I'd mention it in case you had a spare moment.
Best,
-James
Digital Medievalist -- http://www.digitalmedievalist.org/ Journal: http://www.digitalmedievalist.org/journal/ Journal Editors: editors@digitalmedievalist.org News: http://www.digitalmedievalist.org/news/ Wiki: http://www.digitalmedievalist.org/wiki/ Discussion list: dm-l@uleth.ca Change list options: http://listserv.uleth.ca/mailman/listinfo/dm-l