dm-l

dm-l@uleth.ca

2 participants
2789 discussions

SDH 2011 Supporting Digital Humanities
by Matthew James Driscoll 25 Jun '11

25 Jun '11

First call for papers SDH 2011 Supporting the Digital Humanities: Answering the unaskable 17-18 November, Copenhagen Following the first successful SDH conference in Vienna in 2010, the CLARIN<http://www.clarin.eu/> and DARIAH<http://www.dariah.eu/> initiatives have decided to jointly organise the second SDH conference in Copenhagen, Denmark in November 2011. The conference venue will be at the University of Copenhagen, a participant in both CLARIN and DARIAH. Digital technologies have the potential to transform the types of research questions that we ask in the Humanities, and to allow us to address traditional questions in new and exciting ways, but ultimately they will also allow us to answer questions that we were not even aware we could ask, hence the title of this conference. How can digital humanities help us not just to find the answers to our research questions more quickly and more easily, but also to formulate research questions we would never have been able to ask without access to large quantities of digital data and sophisticated tools for their analysis? Supporting the Digital Humanities will be a forum for the discussion of these innovations, and of the ways in which these new forms of research can be facilitated and supported. CLARIN and DARIAH are creating European research infrastructures for the humanities and related disciplines. SDH2011 aims to bring together infrastructure providers and users from the communities involved with the two infrastructure initiatives. The conference will consist of a number of topical sessions where providers and users will present and discuss results, obstacles and opportunities for digitally-supported humanities research. Participants are encouraged to engage with honest assessments of the intellectual problems and practical barriers in an open and constructive atmosphere. The first SDH conference in 2010 gave a broad and multi-facetted presentation of the domains of interest to CLARIN and DARIAH. This time we have chosen a somewhat more focussed approach, focussing on two major themes, but not excluding other themes of interest for the humanities. The two themes are: · Sound and movement - music, spoken word, dance and theatre · Text and things - text, and the relationship between text and material artefacts, such as manuscript, stone or other carriers of text Submissions are invited for individual papers and posters, as well as panels. Focus should be on tools and methods for the analysis of digital data rather than on digitisation processes themselves, both from the provider and from the user perspective. We want to pay special attention to inspiring showcases that demonstrate the innovative power of digital methods in the humanities. Some important dates: July 15, 2011: Submission of suggestion for panels July 24, 2011: Submission of abstracts (4 pages) August 15, 2011: Notification on panel proposals September 15, 2011: Author notification October 15, 2011: Final version of papers for publication (8 pages). November 17-18: Conference in Copenhagen, Denmark Programme committee Bente Maegaard, University of Copenhagen, Denmark Steven Krauwer, Utrecht University, Netherlands Helen Bailey, University of Bedfordshire, UK Tim Crawford, Goldsmith's University of London, UK Matthew Driscoll, University of Copenhagen, Denmark Neil Fraistat, University of Maryland, United States Erhard Hinrichs, Tübingen University, Germany Fotis Jannidis, Würzburg University, Germany Helen Katsiadakis, Academy of Athens, Greece Krister Lindén, Helsinki University, Finland Heike Neuroth, Göttingen State and University Library, Germany Laurent Romary, INRIA, France Nina Vodopivec, Institute for Contemporary History, Ljubljana, Slovenia Peter Wittenburg, MPI, Netherlands/Germany Martin Wynne, Oxford University, UK

7 8

Re: SDH 2011 Supporting Digital Humanities (Peter Damian)
by Jeffrey C. Witt 24 Jun '11

24 Jun '11

Dear Peter (or Edward) You said in your 6th point: There is absolutely no reason why a critical edition, or a translation, > could not be produced entirely online, by a collaborative effort of a small > group, working in different parts of the world. I would welcome ideas on > this, from anyone working on editions, or translations. There has to be a > better way than would we have now, and perhaps this could be achieved by > appropriate use of technology I thought I would just offer my site which attempts to be an "entirely" on line version of a critical edition - which provides access to manuscript images, transcription, and translation through the click of the button. I don't use a wiki format, but I have a comment feature for each paragraph to allow collaboration. While it is still very much a work in progress, I'd love to know what you (or anyone else thinks). Sincerely, Jeffrey -- Jeffrey C. Witt Philosophy Department Boston College Campanella Way 140 Commonwealth Ave Chestnut Hill, MA 02134 www.jeffreycwitt.com On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 11:59 PM, <dm-l-request(a)uleth.ca> wrote: > Send dm-l mailing list submissions to > dm-l(a)uleth.ca > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://listserv.uleth.ca/mailman/listinfo/dm-l > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > dm-l-request(a)uleth.ca > > You can reach the person managing the list at > dm-l-owner(a)uleth.ca > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of dm-l digest..." > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: SDH 2011 Supporting Digital Humanities (Peter Damian) > 2. Fwd: Late Breaking News added to Balisage 2011 Program > (Marjorie Burghart) > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: "Peter Damian" <peter.damian(a)btinternet.com> > To: "Digital Medievalist" <dm-l(a)uleth.ca> > Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 20:23:53 +0100 > Subject: Re: [dm-l] SDH 2011 Supporting Digital Humanities > ** > Thanks for the many helpful comments and apologies for the negative tone of > my original message. On a positive note I would like to enumerate a number > of ways in which I have found computers to be helpful. In the majority of > cases, however, it has been me as an individual using technology (mostly > quite crude, MS office style technology) to do things. I.e. a domain expert > who also uses IT as best I can. The idea of non-domain specialists who are > proficient in IT of itself is in my view an 'old world' view of technology > that takes us back to mainframes and specialist programmers building big > systems and databases. But the world we live in, since the PC arrived in the > 1980s, is increasingly end-user computing. > > 1. Spell checking. I have written one program to do this, which involves > computing all possible Latin inflections in one fell swoop. The MS Word > checker, as you probably know, does not understand inflection. This does > not matter with English, which is comparatively uninflected. The problem is > that there are a few million possible words required, which is simply too > big for MS word, which collapses. The right way would be to construct a > proper parser which understood Latin grammar, but this is beyond my skill. > (Well, possibly not, as my MSc was in natural language processing and > machine translation, but my knowledge of that tells me the job would take > more time and effort than I have). > > 2. More successful was a simple correction function using the VBA > 'textreplace' function. The reason I need this is to convert printed > versions of Latin text into digitised versions. OCR is still pretty > hopeless at character recognition, as we all know, so the corrector function > looks for impossible letter combinations. For example, OCR generally > confused 'e' and 'c', so renders the Latin 'essent' as 'esscnt' or 'csscnt' > or something like that. So I search and replace 'cnt' into 'ent', knowing > that 'cnt' is not possible. There are hundreds of other examples. I also > check for known mistakes on common words, e.g. 'vcl' should be 'vcl' and > stuff like that. > > There still remains the bulk of the work, which is formatting the material > correctly. OCR is not very good at understanding footnotes, Greek words, > other parts of the critical apparatus, and getting this right requires > simple hard work. I have a little image of a medieval scribe on my screen, > who was doing exactly the same thing, really. > > 3. I have a Latin site searcher on my website > http://www.logicmuseum.com/latinsearcher.htm which uses the Google search > engine to look for Latin expressions in a targeted way. This means I can > search for hundreds of examples in the original Latin, in many cases > matching the Latin to an English translation, e.g. like this > http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q="quod%20quid%20est"+site%3Ahttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.logicmuseum.com&meta<http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=%22quod%20quid%20est%22+site%3Ahttp%3A…>= > . This is in principle no different to the way that a dictionary or > wordbook gives you an example of how a phrase is used by the classical > authors. The difference is merely the scale. A dictionary will give you a > handful of results, the search linked to above gives you 53. Again, this is > not sophisticated technology - a few lines of Java plus the already existing > Google. > > 4. I have just implemented a wiki on the same site > http://www.logicmuseum.com/wiki/Main_Page . This was fairly simple and > used existing technology (Mediawiki and Semantic mediawiki). The ambition > is to provide access to all the key (Latin) texts of the medieval period - > the principles are outlined here > http://www.logicmuseum.com/wiki/The_Logic_Museum:What_is_the_Logic_Museum . > Again, the main principles are no different to the old way of doing things. > For example, I used 'anchoring' to index Aristotelian texts to their 'Bekker > number' (a pre-computer way of locating any Aristotelian text by page, > column and line number of the 19C Bekker edition). > > 5. I have used the (fairly basic) MediaWiki implementation of tables to > make parallel Latin English translations - thus fulfillling the ambition of > bringing these wonderful works to a wider audience. E.g. here > http://www.logicmuseum.com/wiki/Authors/Ockham/Summa_Logicae/Book_I/Chapter… . > This is an area where pure IT could actually help, as the Java > based CKeditor is awful, full of bugs and difficult to use. But it is > usable. Note the green tick marks on the page which tell me that the page > has been checked once (but not peer reviewed). This is the technology > version of a system that translators have used for centuries. > > On the general subject of bringing to a wider audience I was inspired some > years ago by the site of a critical edition in a specialist library. It was > fifty years old, in tatters, with pages missing. To locate these texts you > had to use a card index. When you took the book out, you had to fill a form > in and place it on the shelf. Then you would place the book on a trolley > for it to be filed by some clerk. The building itself dates from the 1930s > and has not received a lick of paint since then. There has to be a better > way than this. Add to that the fact that, even though I have the run of the > finest London libraries, there are many important texts that they do not > have (e.g. the Alluntis edition of Scotus' Quodlibetal questions - not in > any London library). Why do people spend a lot of time and effort preparing > these editions, to have some press squirt ink onto paper, publish them at > hugely inflated prices, even though the main work of doing them (preparation > and peer review) was unpaid labour? There has to be a better system - > although the problem here is economic, not IT related. > > 6. Which naturally brings me to wikis. Daniel Paul O'Donnell > ("Disciplinary impact and technological obsolescence in digital > medieval studies" online here > > http://people.uleth.ca/~daniel.odonnell/Research/disciplinary-impact-and-te…) > > makes some very good points on this. The technology of wikis is proven, > yet academic specialists do not use them. He says (correctly) that this is > an economic problem. Wikis depend on collaborative effort, where the > contributions of the individual are subordinate to the interests of the > group. But "in my experience, most professional scholars initially are > extremely impressed by the possibilities offered by collaborative software > like wikis and other forms of annotation engines—before almost immediately > bumping up against the problems of prestige and quality control that > currently make them infeasible as channels of high level scholarly > communication ... Professional scholars traditionally achieve success—both > institutionally and in terms of reputation—by the quality and amount of > their research publications. Community-based collaborative projects do not > easily fit into this model. " > I believe these problems could be resolved by better use of categorisation > and markup (to address the quality control issue), and by allowing > 'ownership' of designated pages on the wiki. There is absolutely no reason > why a critical edition, or a translation, could not be produced entirely > online, by a collaborative effort of a small group, working in different > parts of the world. I would welcome ideas on this, from anyone working on > editions, or translations. There has to be a better way than would we have > now, and perhaps this could be achieved by appropriate use of technology. > > Edward > > > > >

2 2

Fwd: Late Breaking News added to Balisage 2011 Program
by Marjorie Burghart 23 Jun '11

23 Jun '11

Dear all, I've been amused by one of the added topics at the BALISAGE conference (see email below: "Why is XML a pain to produce?" I would be curious to know the fellow Digital Medievalists on that. Off the top of my head, I'd say "because uit's semantic!" Any thoughts? :) Best wishes, Marjorie -------- Message original -------- Sujet: Late Breaking News added to Balisage 2011 Program Date : Thu, 23 Jun 2011 12:53:06 -0400 De : Tommie Usdin <btusdin(a)MULBERRYTECH.COM> Répondre à : Tommie Usdin <btusdin(a)MULBERRYTECH.COM> Pour : TEI-L(a)listserv.brown.edu Balisage 2011 Program Finalized When the regular (peer-reviewed) part of the Balisage 2011 program was scheduled, a few slots were reserved for presentation of "Late breaking" material. These presentations have now been selected and added to the program. Topics added include: - XQuery and SparQL - XQuery and XSLT - the Logical Form of a Metadata Record - Why is XML a pain to produce? - XML Serialization of C# and Java Objects - testing XSLT in continuous integration - dealing with markup without using words - REST for document resource nodes - tagging journal article supplemental materials - using 15 year old SGML documents in current software The program already included talks about DITA, XSLT, generic microformats, XML Ebooks, JSON, multiple hrefs, XML editors, markup overlap, encryption of XML documents, and XML Interoperability, among others. Now it is a real must for anyone who thinks deeply about markup. Balisage is the XML Geek-fest; the annual gathering of people who design markup and markup-based applications; who develop XML specifications, standards, and tools; the people who read and write, books about publishing technologies in general and XML in particular; and super-users of XML and related technologies. You can read about the Balisage 2011 conference at http://www.balisage.net. Schedule At A Glance: http://www.balisage.net/2011/At-A-Glance.html Detailed program: http://www.balisage.net/2011/Program.html ====================================================================== Balisage: The Markup Conference 2011 mailto:info@balisage.net August 2-5, 2011 http://www.balisage.net Symposium on Document-Oriented XML Montreal, Canada August 1, 2011 ======================================================================

1 0

Latin spell checker (was: Re: [dm-l] SDH 2011 Supporting Digital Humanities)
by Farkas Kiss 23 Jun '11

23 Jun '11

Beside Marjorie's suggestion, you might want to try an OpenOffice extension, which has already a considerable amount of words (84000). And it is for free. http://extensions.services.openoffice.org/en/node/1141/releases (try reloading the page if it doesn' load at the first time) Farkas Kiss Eötvös Loránd University, Faculty of Humanities Institute of Cultural Studies and Hungarian Literature Múzeum körút 4/A, Budapest, 1088, Hungary Phone: (+361) 485 5238 fax: (+361 411 6700 5256)

1 0

Digital Classicist & Institute of Classical Studies Seminar
by Stuart Dunn 22 Jun '11

22 Jun '11

With apologies for cross postings. Digital Classicist & Institute of Classical Studies Seminar Friday June 24th at 16:30 Court Room, Senate House, Malet Street, London, WC1E 7HU Alessandro Vatri (Oxford) HdtDep: a treebank and search engine for Greek word order study ALL WELCOME HdtDep is a treebank and search engine based on the first book of Herodotus’ Histories. The structure of the sentences has been parsed applying a modified version of Mel’cuk’s dependency syntax, and has been encoded in an XML database. The search engine allows searching for precise dependency patterns involving specific grammatical categories or lexemes in exact sequences, and can easily be programmed through a user friendly graphic interface. This tool is especially designed for classicists and linguists investigating Greek word order—hence the choice of Herodotus’ prose as linguistic material—but can also be useful for teachers and language learners. The seminar will be followed by wine and refreshments. For more information please contact Gabriel.Bodard(a)kcl.ac.uk, Stuart.Dunn(a)kcl.ac.uk, S.Mahony(a)ucl.ac.uk, or see the seminar website at http://www.digitalclassicist.org/wip/wip2011.html -- Dr Stuart Dunn Research Fellow Centre for e-Research King's College London www.stuartdunn.wordpress.com Tel +44 (0)207 848 2709 Fax +44 (0)207 848 1989 stuart.dunn(a)kcl.ac.uk Centre for e-Research 26-29 Drury Lane London WC2B 5RL UK Geohash:http://geohash.org/gcpvj1zm7yp1

1 0

Report from the ACH at DH2011
by Dot Porter 21 Jun '11

21 Jun '11

Of interest to DM, a report from the ACH (Association for Computers and the Humanities: http://www.ach.org/) general meeting at DH2011 (Digital Humanities 2011 conference: https://dh2011.stanford.edu/) Especially of interest may be the last item in the report, a discussion of ACH partnering with other groups to support local/regional events. Not mentioned in the report, there was also a discussion about ACH partnering with scholarly organizations and communities. As someone with connections both to DM (former board member) and to the ACH (current executive secretary) I'd be interested to hear ideas from the DM community on how the ACH might be able to support our community. Dot ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Humanist Discussion Group <willard.mccarty(a)mccarty.org.uk> Date: Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 4:52 PM Subject: [Humanist] 25.120 report from the ACH at DH2011 To: humanist(a)lists.digitalhumanities.org Humanist Discussion Group, Vol. 25, No. 120. Centre for Computing in the Humanities, King's College London www.digitalhumanities.org/humanist Submit to: humanist(a)lists.digitalhumanities.org Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 10:53:46 -0700 From: Stéfan_Sinclair <sgsinclair(a)gmail.com> Subject: Report from ACH Annual General Meeting at Stanford Dear Colleagues, This is intended as a brief report on the ACH Annual General Meeting that took place during the Digital Humanities 2011 conference at Stanford. The first notable aspect of the meeting was the astounding attendance: there were over 80 people present. In the past years the meeting has shifted from reporting the deliberations of the Executive Council (not always the most compelling content) to a summary of key points and a more open format of discussion and community-focused initiatives. We began the meeting by recognizing the passing away of our friend and colleague Chuck Bush, who was the ACH Treasurer and served on its executive council for more than 20 years (see http://ach.org/charles-douglas-bush-1948-2011). New members of the Executive Council were welcomed and outgoing members were thanked. A warm and sustained ovation was reserved for Julia Flanders, outgoing President extraordinaire. Next we launched into the annual ACH Jobs Slam, a chance for prospective employees to introduce themselves (Ed Finn and Molly Des Jardin) as well as an encouraging range of job opportunities: * Mellon Postdocs at Emory: http://bit.ly/disc-postdoc * Research Professorship at BYU: http://bit.ly/jWu6EI * Lecturer in Digital Information Studies at UCL: http://bit.ly/hFCaRH * Assoc. Library Director of Digital Initiatives at McGill: http://bit.ly/kcD1gz * Digital Humanities Academic Administrator at UCLA: http://bit.ly/iCQI4g * Web Developers at NYPL: http://bit.ly/mRGKA0 We also pointed to two very useful lists of jobs: http://www.arts-humanities.net/jobs and http://www.hastac.org/forum/23 Finally, we reminded everyone of the ongoing ACH mentoring programme http://ach.org/mentoring We encourage thesis supervisors who have students finishing and looking for DH-oriented jobs to contact the Mentoring committee. Following the Jobs Slam we covered some new and ongoing initiatives. In particular: * the ACH has a completely revamped website! http://ach.org/ * we invited everyone to express interest to get involved in ACH committees * we discussed the success of DHAnswers and invited colleagues to contribute http://digitalhumanities.org/answers/ Finally, we had two open discussion topics. The first was regarding a possible name change for ACH. The Executive Council recognizes that "Association of Computers and the Humanities" may not be as expressive of contemporary digital humanities scholarship and teaching as it might be. Some present pointed out the danger that the title may keep new people away. However, the overwhelming tenor of the discussion was that a change would present several logistical challenges and there was a certain attachment to the historical context that the ACH represents (much like the anachronistic sounding Association for Computing Machinery). Moreover, using the acronym ACH somewhat masks the details anyway. Second, we discussed possibilities for the ACH to partner with local events to provide more continuous and more regional support and presence for the ACH constituency. A whole range of suggestions were offered and the ACH Exec will try experimenting with some of them and report back about this next year. Thanks to all who were present and contributed! [Please do not reply to this message as I use this address for communication that is susceptible to spambots. My regular email address starts with my user handle sgs and uses the domain name mcmaster.ca] -- Dr. Stéfan Sinclair, Multimedia, McMaster University Phone: 905.525.9140 x23930; Fax: 905.527.6793 Address: TSH-328, Communication Studies & Multimedia Hamilton, Ontario, Canada L8S 4M2 http://stefansinclair.name/ _______________________________________________ List posts to: humanist(a)lists.digitalhumanities.org List info and archives at at: http://digitalhumanities.org/humanist Listmember interface at: http://digitalhumanities.org/humanist/Restricted/listmember_interface.php Subscribe at: http://www.digitalhumanities.org/humanist/membership_form.php -- *~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~* Dot Porter (MA, MSLS) Digital Medievalist, Digital Librarian Email: dot.porter(a)gmail.com *~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*

1 0

Digital Classicist & Institute of Classical Studies Seminar
by Digital Medievalist » News: digitalmedievalistnews 21 Jun '11

21 Jun '11

1 0

Research Associate vacancy at King's College London, Centre for e-Research
by Tupman, Charlotte 20 Jun '11

20 Jun '11

Research Associate at King's College London, Centre for e-Research The Centre for e-Research is seeking a Research Associate with strong technical and software development skills to work on e-research projects at the Centre. These projects may result in case studies, proofs of concept and pilots as well as in software for operational service, so the post offers an exciting opportunity to contribute both to the development of the digital and research infrastructure at King's and its collaborators, and to more exploratory development of innovative ideas solutions using cutting edge approaches. The post-holder will be expected to publish the results of research undertaken in relevant journals. Some current and past projects may be found at http://www.kcl.ac.uk/iss/cerch/projects/. Approximately 75% of the post-holder's work (on average over the 2 years of the appointment) will be dedicated to the SAWS (Sharing Ancient Wisdoms) project, an EU-funded international collaboration that is exploring ways of exploiting the digital environment for creating, publishing and interacting with selected digital collections of manuscripts and texts, specifically Greek and Arabic “wisdom literature”. These anthologies of wise or useful sayings were widely circulated throughout antiquity and the middle ages, and they raise particular challenges at a technical and information modelling level due to the complex network of interrelationships among them and among their component parts. The SAWS project requires an imaginative research associate capable of researching, devising and developing innovative methodologies and tools for creating these complex resources, for expressing relationships between them, and for publishing, visualising and exploring them. The remaining 25% will be spent on other projects at the Centre, depending on ongoing requirements and the interests of the appointee. The candidate will preferably have an education in information science or computer science, or a humanities degree with a strong technical component. Due to the exploratory nature of the work, the role will require problem-solving ability and a high degree of initiative, as well as flexibility and a keenness to learn. Knowledge of Java, web development technologies (e.g. XML, Django, Ajax) and web service technologies is essential. Experience of linked data/semantic web technologies (e.g. RDF, OWL), and of other programming languages (e.g. Python, Ruby), would be an advantage. This is a full-time position, initially for a period of 24 months. Salary for the position will be at an appropriate point of Grade 6, currently £33,193 to £39,185 per annum (inclusive of a £2,323 London allowance). Benefits include a contributory final salary pension scheme, subsidised gym membership and 27 days of annual leave, 4 college closure days, plus public holidays. For more details and an application pack please see http://www.kcl.ac.uk/depsta/pertra/vacancy/external/pers_detail.php?jobinde…. Alternatively, please email strand-recruitment(a)kcl.ac.uk. All correspondence should clearly state the job title and reference number G6/QLJ/408/11-JT. For an informal discussion of the post please contact Mark Hedges on mark.hedges(a)kcl.ac.uk, or 020 7848 1970. The closing date is: 12 July 2011 -- Dr. Charlotte Tupman Research Associate Department of Digital Humanities King's College London 26-29 Drury Lane London WC2B 5RL Tel: +44 (0)20 7848 7145 www.kcl.ac.uk/ddh

1 0

Save the Date: 4th Annual Schoenberg Symposium on Manuscript Studies in the Digital Age
by Lynn Ransom 14 Jun '11

14 Jun '11

4th Annual Lawrence J. Schoenberg Symposium on Manuscript Studies in the Digital Age October 21-22, 2011 Writing the East: History and New Technologies in the Study of Asian Manuscript Traditions In partnership with the Rare Book Department of the Free Library of Philadelphia and the University of Pennsylvania Museum of Archaeology and Anthropology, Penn Libraries are pleased to announce the 4th annual <http://www.library.upenn.edu/exhibits/lectures/ljs_symposium.html> Lawrence J. Schoenberg Symposium on Manuscript Studies in the Digital Age. This year's symposium will explore a range of issues relating to Asian reading and writing cultures, especially as they pertain to the manuscript source. Our focus will be on Asian manuscripts from the Islamic, Hindu, Buddhist, Taoist, and Confucian traditions. We will bring together scholars representing these traditions to examine the ways in which hand-produced texts shape both meaning and interpretation, and to a larger extent, the cultural norms that define their use. We will also consider the role that modern digital technology can play in facilitating the study of manuscripts today. Registration opens August 15. For more information, go to <http://www.library.upenn.edu/exhibits/lectures/ljs_symposium4.html> http://www.library.upenn.edu/exhibits/lectures/ljs_symposium4.html ****************** Lynn Ransom, Ph.D. Project Manager, Lawrence J. Schoenberg Database of Manuscripts Schoenberg Center for Electronic Text & Image The University of Pennsylvania Libraries 3420 Walnut Street Philadelphia, PA 19104-6206 215.898.7851 http://dla.library.upenn.edu/dla/schoenberg

1 0

Digital Classicist & Institute of Classical Studies Seminar
by Digital Medievalist » News: digitalmedievalistnews 14 Jun '11

14 Jun '11

1 0

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

dm-l