1) a lot of people I know would be very happy working with a good
facsimile, or would not want a critical edition that changed the
manuscript readings in any way. (In fact, I know a lot of theorists [not
I] who hold that monkeying with the reading of an Ms is unwarranted
intrusion to keep the profession alive and 'needed')
2) no one asked us to play a role in the development of writing
systems, or printing, or typewriters, or book production. One could
argue that this time we are lucky to have a hand in the development of
computer methods - but one could just as easily argue that there is no
more reason for us to do that than there was when those other methods of
textual communication were being developed....