Re: [globaloutlookDH-l] GO::DH response to ADHO Change in Chair and Call for Recommendations on inter-cultural communication

-- Vika Zafrin Institutional Repository Librarian Boston University +1 617.358.6370 | http://open.bu.edu/ O'Donnell, Dan wrote: > > I really think this would be a great idea, though the basic problem is > that it deals in stereotypes. We also need to watch out that it > doesn't become victim blaming--for example in the way that the endless > articles advising women to speak and behave differently in order to > succeed do. > > > But we all have a sense that some disciplines, academic cultures, and > languages, stereotypically at least value different things: when I was > TEI chair, I was well aware of the different academic culture between > the U.S. and the U.K., for example (I used to joke that I was made TEI > chair because I could tell when the Americans were angry and the > English weren't). But I don't know how you could report that without > trading in stereotypes. > > > > Daniel Paul O'Donnell > > Professor of English > > University of Lethbridge > > 4401 University Drive West > > Lethbridge AB T1K 3M4 > > Canada > > Tel. +1 (403) 329-2377 > > > http://people.uleth.ca/~daniel.odonnell > http://people.uleth.ca/%7Edaniel.odonnell > > @danielPaulOD > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > *From:* globaloutlookdh-l globaloutlookdh-l-bounces@uleth.ca on > behalf of Vika Zafrin vzafrin@bu.edu > *Sent:* December 2, 2015 10:44 > *To:* globaloutlookdh-l, MailList > *Subject:* Re: [globaloutlookDH-l] GO::DH response to ADHO Change in > Chair and Call for Recommendations on inter-cultural communication > Alex Gil wrote: >> To Vika's question, can you clarify a bit more, Vika, what you mean? > I'm not sure about the full extent of what I mean. But somewhere > upthread someone mentioned aggressive vs supportive manners of > engaging with a presenter, a cultural difference of which I've had a > dim idea, but which I didn't consciously hold to be something that > would—unspoken—exclude people from participating in an international > discussion. It would be difficult to create a sensitive yet effective > resource documenting some cross-cultural translation, but it may be > worth the effort. > > I'm thinking of something like: > > - If you're from X, scholars from outside your culture may seem meek > and ineffectual to you. If that's true for you, consider consciously > making space for them in conversation. > - If you're from Y, engaging with scholars from outside your culture > may feel like a constant personal attack. If that's a pattern that's > true for you, it may not be conscious; you might try to de-personalize > it, or consider bringing it up to allies as an issue. > > Or, further de-personalized: we've noticed some patterns, and we're > compiling them here because we think awareness of them would be useful > to moving the DH community toward true globalization. Scholarly > cultures in X region seem considerably more aggressive in debate than > they do in Y region. Etc. > > -Vika > > >> >> On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 12:21 PM, Daniel O'Donnell >> <daniel.odonnell@uleth.ca mailto:daniel.odonnell@uleth.ca> wrote: >> >> Not that I'm aware of. >> >> >> On Wed, Dec 2, 2015, 08:06 Vika Zafrin <vzafrin@bu.edu >> mailto:vzafrin@bu.edu> wrote: >> >> Dear Isabel and all, >> >> The latest few emails in this thread, and the deeply thought >> out response document for Karina and the SC, have led me to >> wonder whether it would be possible to compile a document >> explaining to scholars the differences in academic language >> among different communities, whether separated by language, >> nationality, world region, or other factors. I don't feel >> qualified to lead such an effort, though would certainly try >> to contribute to it. But it seems like maybe an appropriate >> project for GO::DH? >> >> Please forgive me if someone has already written about this. >> I've tried to keep up with the list, but have not been >> entirely successful, especially of late. >> >> >> -Vika >> >> -- >> Vika Zafrin >> Institutional Repository Librarian >> Boston University >> +1 617.358.6370 tel:617.358.6370 | http://open.bu.edu/ >> >> >> igalina wrote: >>> >>> Dear Sara and All, >>> >>> I think Sara's comment about reviewers is both a practical >>> issue but also a fundamental reflection of how deep or >>> superficial the consequences of our initiatives are. Indeed, >>> although CfP in many different languages looks and sounds >>> good, and is most definitely a step forward, with no >>> reviewers the step is tiny indeed. I also think that some >>> of the discussions regarding 'who is entitled to be a >>> reviewer' reflect more deep rooted prejudices - ie. for >>> example, to be a reviewer in English there are one set of >>> requirements and a proposal to be a reviewer in other >>> languages had different requirements, not only language ones >>> but some that seemed to be related to the 'quality' and >>> 'knowledge' of the reviewer. >>> >>> I would like to add to this discussion the issue of the >>> publications that ADHO sponsors. I think that some >>> discussions that are being had, again related to language >>> and quality of research, should not be among a few, but >>> rather open to a more public debate. What do we expect from >>> our publications as ADHO members? As non-Anglo members (or >>> English as a second language members), how do the different >>> ADHO journals respond to our needs? Although some (not all) >>> are in theory multi-lingual, do they *really* have the >>> infrastructure to respond to multi-lingual needs? And if >>> they don't, how can we help to make this a real possiblity? >>> >>> Best, >>> >>> Isabel >>> >>> >>> ---------- >>> Dra. Isabel Galina Russell >>> Instituto de Investigaciones Bibliográficas, >>> Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM) >>> igalina@unam.mx mailto:igalina@unam.mx >>> @igalina >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> *De:* globaloutlookdh-l globaloutlookdh-l-bounces@uleth.ca >>> mailto:globaloutlookdh-l-bounces@uleth.ca en nombre de >>> Alex Gil colibri.alex@gmail.com >>> mailto:colibri.alex@gmail.com >>> *Enviado:* martes, 1 de diciembre de 2015 11:41 a. m. >>> *Para:* A list for participants in the ADHO DH Global >>> Outlook Community >>> *Asunto:* Re: [globaloutlookDH-l] GO::DH response to ADHO >>> Change in Chair and Call for Recommendations on >>> inter-cultural communication >>> Thank you, Sara, for this background. Things are in >>> transition right now and the question of recruiting language >>> reviewers hinges more at this moment on whether the >>> structures will be there to receive them. I think GO::DH >>> could, in theory, expand the reviewer pool by a substantial >>> amount if we set our energies to it, but I think there are >>> tacit reasons why that massive recruitment effort hasn't >>> happened. I /personally/ think we still have work to do on >>> the ADHO side (and to a lesser degree our own CO's) before >>> I, again /personally/, go out on a campaign to bring in >>> friends and friends of friends into the fold. You shrewdly >>> notice though that some of us with reservations will do that >>> work for Montreal and Mexico, and /just in time/, we hope, >>> as some or all of our recommendations get implemented. >>> >>> cheers, >>> a. >>> >>> On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 8:37 PM, Sara A. Schmidt >>> <saschmidt8@gmail.com mailto:saschmidt8@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> In response to Isabel's question "What role can having >>> the DH conference in Mexico City have in 2018?" I feel >>> compelled to note that I sincerely hope the Montreal and >>> Mexico City conferences will lead to more French and >>> Spanish speakers volunteering to review for the DH >>> conference. >>> >>> As some of you may know, I set up accounts for reviewers >>> in conftool back in the fall of 2006 and worked with a >>> few Program Committee Chairs to add more reviewers >>> paying particular attention to increasing the numbers of >>> those willing to read the languages listed in the DH2007 >>> and DH2008 cfps and particular attention to increasing >>> the numbers of reviewers with expertise in certain >>> subject areas where there was a need for additional >>> reviewers. I'm still rather amazed that ADHO would list >>> Chinese and Japanese in a cfp when they only had one >>> reviewer willing and able to read those languages circa >>> fall 2006 and Arabic when they didn't have a single >>> reviewer capable of reading Arabic. Okay, technically >>> the cfp did state that authors were supposed to provide >>> an English language translation of their abstracts, but >>> as I would have anticipated not everyone noted that they >>> were supposed to provide an English translation. >>> Consequently the DH2007 PC Chair ended up needing to >>> have some Russian abstracts translated by a member of >>> the PC Committee because he not only didn't have enough >>> reviewers capable of reading Russian circa fall 2006, he >>> also didn't know which reviewers could read Russian. >>> >>> While I did manage to increase the numbers of reviewers >>> willing to read languages other than English and to add >>> information regarding languages reviewers were willing >>> to read into conftool abet in a less than ideal way, >>> there was still a need for far more work to be done in >>> my opinion. While I know ADHO has since moved to issuing >>> open calls for reviewers, my witnessing one while still >>> working on the database suggested to me that open calls >>> work to increase the number of individuals in the same >>> country as the PC Chair (since they are more likely to >>> see and respond to the call as soon as it is sent out) >>> and the number of North Americans (since there a number >>> of North Americans who will tweet and retweet the calls >>> for reviewers so they reach their North American >>> colleagues). >>> >>> My understanding is that there should be an open call >>> for reviewers before the next conference. I would >>> strongly encourage members of the GO:DH community to >>> share that call with their colleagues especially those >>> colleagues who would be willing to read abstracts in any >>> languages other than English. Even if a particular >>> language isn't listed in the cfp for DH2016, there is >>> always a chance that someone might turn in an abstract >>> dealing with texts in that particular language and in my >>> opinion it would be very helpful for the PC Chair to >>> have the opportunity to assign the abstract to at least >>> one reviewer who can read that language. I also honestly >>> believe that having a more linguistically and culturally >>> diverse pool of reviewers is very beneficial for the >>> conference. >>> >>> I would also note that I know in the pre-DH2007 period >>> there was a willingness to allow reviewers to volunteer >>> to review abstracts in languages other than English >>> without requiring them to review English language >>> abstracts. I wish the powers that be were still allowing >>> this as I feel it might be easier to increase the >>> numbers of reviewers willing to read certain languages >>> if one allowed them to choose to only read abstracts in >>> their first language. There also was a willingness to >>> let reviewers provide comments for authors in the >>> language the abstract was submitted in as long as they >>> also provided some feedback for the PC in English as well. >>> >>> Sara Schmidt >>> >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 4:46 PM, igalina >>> <igalina@unam.mx mailto:igalina@unam.mx> wrote: >>> >>> Dear All, >>> I would like to join in and celebrate the fact that >>> you invited us all to contribute to the document. I >>> am sorry that due to the short time span and >>> personal workload I was unable to contribute to the >>> document. >>> >>> I think there is a general agreement that the AHDO >>> structure is currently not flexible or inclusive >>> enough and recent episodes are a reflection of >>> this. I am not quite sure though what I would like >>> ADHO to look like and how it should function. At >>> present there seems to be a division between a >>> national/regional approach and a linguistic one >>> (sometimes they are the same but not always). As it >>> stands currently the structure doesn't make much >>> sense, and it doesn't seem very fair in terms of >>> decision making. However, I think that the groups, >>> in particular this one, are in place for us to have >>> discussions about this. >>> The RedHD is not a CO or part of a CO. Where do we >>> fit in in all of this? What are the different >>> options for participating? How do we relate not only >>> to ADHO but to other DH associations both official >>> and 'un-official' or emerging? What role can having >>> the DH conference in Mexico City have in 2018? >>> I think that one of the most important issues, >>> regardless of how one becomes associated to ADHO, is >>> how the agenda is decided and discussed. Association >>> should not mean assimilation. >>> Sorry if my ideas are not very developed but I did >>> want to write and say how important I think this >>> discussion is. >>> Best, >>> Isabel >>> >>> ---------- >>> Dra. Isabel Galina Russell >>> Instituto de Investigaciones Bibliográficas, >>> Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM) >>> igalina@unam.mx mailto:igalina@unam.mx >>> @igalina >>> >>> ________________________________________ >>> De: globaloutlookdh-l >>> <globaloutlookdh-l-bounces@uleth.ca >>> mailto:globaloutlookdh-l-bounces@uleth.ca> en >>> nombre de Øyvind Eide <lister@oeide.no >>> mailto:lister@oeide.no> >>> Enviado: domingo, 29 de noviembre de 2015 02:28 p. m. >>> Para: A list for participants in the ADHO DH Global >>> Outlook Community >>> Asunto: Re: [globaloutlookDH-l] GO::DH response to >>> ADHO Change in Chair and Call for >>> Recommendations on inter-cultural communication >>> >>> Dear Domenico, >>> >>> Thank you for a clear and thorough reply. We may not >>> agree on all aspects of history, nor on the details >>> of the best (least bad) future organisation (should >>> the power of Iceland be the same as the power of >>> China? Maybe that is the least bad we can do), but I >>> think we agree that ADHO must change into something >>> easier to manage and more representative and >>> inclusive. My take on this is to see what comes out >>> of the current process for simplifying the structure >>> of ADHO. If that indeed makes it better it gives us >>> a starting point for further development and changes. >>> >>> ADHO is a tool which is only meaningful as long as >>> it makes sense to us, it should never become a goal >>> in itself. For those working within the system that >>> is always important to remember, it is so easy to >>> make our tools our goals. For me ADHO still makes >>> sense. We do good things with it and it is a place >>> to meet. >>> >>> I also believe that the free software concept of >>> “gjørokrati” (do-ocracy in English?) is one aspect >>> -- those who are willing to do work gets more >>> influence. It has to be checked and limited by other >>> bases for power, though. >>> >>> Ha en fin kveld, >>> >>> Øyvind >>> >>> On 29. nov. 2015, at 20:51, Domenico Fiormonte wrote: >>> >>> > Dear Øyvind and everyone, >>> > >>> > my observations referred initially to the quality >>> and nature of the decision-making process that will >>> lead ADHO to accept or not our suggestions. Then I >>> extended my observations, in my usual polemic style, >>> to ADHO political and institutional settings as a >>> whole. I'm delighted to answer your question, but I >>> would like to know if you think that spending hours >>> on these proposals knowing that ADHO has no >>> obligation to accept any of them is a part of a >>> democratic exercise. Of course I believe it is >>> better than nothing. But even octroyées >>> constitutions were better than absolutism. >>> > >>> > What I would prefer for our community is not a >>> mystery and you can find it in dozens of articles, >>> blog posts, emails, etc. I made public in the last >>> fifteen years. What I think we need is a federation >>> of national associations. >>> > Isn't that simple? Not perfect, of course, but a >>> step forward. >>> > >>> > I know that an elective political system is just >>> one of the several features that defines and >>> constitutes a democratic system. But what you call >>> indirect democracy derives from the intrinsic limits >>> of the ADHO initial project, i.e. to create an >>> umbrella organization for what was already there -- >>> at least in the visible horizon of a prevalently >>> Anglophone community. I don't think that in those >>> times it was a bad idea or that ADHO has done >>> nothing so far to be more inclusive. However, that >>> original bias remained. The structure was created to >>> include existent associations (although recently the >>> new Australasian association joined ADHO >>> reaffirming the Anglophone majority). Other national >>> European associations, like the Italian AIUCD and >>> the German DDH, joined ADHO through the EADH. The >>> result is that both the presence and the influence >>> of Italian and German communities are in principle >>> diluted comparing to other national communities. >>> > And how about the French and Spanish associations? >>> Do we think these two communities will accept, like >>> the German and the Italian associations, to be >>> represented in ADHO by the EADH? (Incidentally, the >>> process that led at least one of these two >>> associations to join EADH was far from transparent, >>> as members were not publicly consulted.) >>> > >>> > I'm aware of present ADHO's efforts to reflect in >>> its committees a power balance not just based on >>> numbers, but that doesn't change the essence of the >>> problem: inequality of representation. This >>> inequality, unfortunately, it's a default condition >>> of the present governance structure. >>> > >>> > As I said and wrote many times, it is not >>> acceptable that if I represent a national group in >>> Europe I could join ADHO only through EADH, but if >>> I am Mexican or Canadian I can join directly. It is >>> like saying that if Turkey wants to join the EU has >>> to join before Romania or Hungary. I'm aware that >>> absurdities like these have historical reasons. But >>> we are here to change and make our history, not to >>> be subjects of it. So I'm really sorry for those >>> friends and colleagues who spent a considerable >>> amount of time, and in same cases most of their >>> lifes, building and strengthening organizations like >>> EADH, but in fact the same existence of such >>> 'constituent organizations' makes today not possible >>> to speak about a democratically representative DH >>> international organization. What seems more serious >>> is that the current governance structure prevents >>> other regional and national groups to join ADHO >>> freely and on equal basis preconditions. >>> > >>> > I think it is just a matter of time: things soon >>> or later will change also in DH, and new realities >>> will substitute old ones. You may not agree with >>> what I wrote so far, but what is clear is that >>> present structures cannot accommodate the global >>> explosion of DH. The sooner we'll realize this, the >>> better for everyone. >>> > >>> > Sorry for this lengthy reply. >>> > >>> > Saluti a tutti >>> > >>> > Domenico >>> > >>> > Il 29/Nov/2015 13:56, "Øyvind Eide" >>> <lister@oeide.no mailto:lister@oeide.no> ha scritto: >>> > Dear Domenico, >>> > >>> > ADHO is an indirect democracy: there are six >>> constituent organisations, with (I think all of >>> them) elected boards. These boards select voting >>> members to the ADHO Steering Committee. >>> > >>> > Whether such an indirect structure can be called >>> democratic is a question of how one defines >>> democracy. But there are other organisations using a >>> similar indirect structure that are claimed to be >>> democratic. >>> > >>> > Would you prefer to turn ADHO into an organisation >>> with personal membership and a Steering Committee >>> elected on a one person-one vote basis? >>> > >>> > Regards, >>> > >>> > Øyvind >>> > >>> > On 29. nov. 2015, at 06:38, Domenico Fiormonte wrote: >>> > >>> > > Hi Élika and everyone, >>> > > >>> > > I just realized that I've inserted in the >>> intercultural etc. document some proposals and >>> reflections that are quite general and concern also >>> governance and other topics. Just feel free to move >>> them around if you think they make any sense. >>> > > >>> > > Thanks for giving us the opportunity to discuss >>> these issues in a collective way. But the fact that >>> ADHO can either accept or reject these suggestions >>> reminds me of a situation similar to XVII-XVIII >>> century Europe where kings and rulers could or could >>> not accept the proposals made by elected or >>> partially elected assemblies. So once again I like >>> to call a spade a spade: ADHO it is not a democratic >>> organization. We can put as much effort as we wish >>> in drafting our proposals and pushing our requests, >>> but the reality is that our action can be >>> considered, in the best case, what constitutional >>> experts would call a form of 'moral persuasion'. >>> > > So I'm afraid we are not still equal on this >>> (digital humanities) world. >>> > > >>> > > Sorry for being out of line with this. But there >>> is no other way to defend democracy in these days >>> except to start applying it. >>> > > >>> > > Domenico >>> > > Il 29/Nov/2015 06:46, "Élika Ortega" >>> <elikaortega@gmail.com >>> mailto:elikaortega@gmail.com> ha scritto: >>> > > Dear all, >>> > > >>> > > This is the link to part 1 of the document we're >>> working on Governance and Mentorship that Alex Gil >>> and I prepared. >>> > > >>> > > >>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1uM7ePK-SRCqvI8axCKZnykg4H3WBHDAIeUHWd3rL... >>> > > >>> > > Please, feel free to add and comment. >>> > > >>> > > All best, >>> > > Élika >>> > > >>> > > On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 10:35 AM, Daniel >>> O'Donnell <daniel.odonnell@uleth.ca >>> mailto:daniel.odonnell@uleth.ca> wrote: >>> > > Hi all, >>> > > >>> > > Earlier this week, ADHO announced a change in >>> leadership as John Nerbonne stepped down as ADHO >>> chair and Karina van Dalen-Oskam was elected as >>> interim chair (the announcement is here: >>> http://adho.org/announcements/2015/adho-announces-new-steering-committee-cha...). >>> As part of the announcement, Karina called for a >>> discussion on inter-cultural communication: >>> > > >>> > > "The first thing I have asked the Steering >>> Committee to do, is to establish a protocol or a set >>> of rules/guidelines for dealing with these >>> fundamental cultural issues. We will not be the only >>> organization that runs into this kind of problems. I >>> have asked all members of the Steering Committee to >>> do some research, and I would welcome input from >>> others as well. Can you find guidelines that we >>> could adopt/adapt for ADHO? Do colleagues from other >>> international organizations have suggestions based >>> on their own experience? Are there policy makers who >>> can help? " >>> > > >>> > > This is something GO::DH can contribute to: it >>> is closely related to our core interest AND we have >>> actually discussed parts of this in our early days >>> (see for example, the discussion involving some of >>> these emails: >>> http://listserv.uleth.ca/pipermail/globaloutlookdh-l/2013-April/000319.html >>> http://listserv.uleth.ca/pipermail/globaloutlookdh-l/2013-January/000163.htm... >>> http://listserv.uleth.ca/pipermail/globaloutlookdh-l/2013-January/000188.htm... >>> > > >>> > > At our meeting today, the executive decided to >>> lead development of a GO::DH response to Karina's >>> call. Because of the time limitations, we will not >>> be able to have a full membership development and >>> approval process (it is due Nov. 30th), though we >>> may want to develop the interim statement further >>> using that process after it is submitted to ADHO. >>> For this reason it will be submitted formally as a >>> document of the executive (and any additional >>> authors) and as specifically reflecting their views >>> rather than those of the SIG as a whole. >>> > > >>> > > But we would very much to develop this as openly >>> and as broadly as possible within those constraints. >>> > > >>> > > To do this, we will be developing and writing >>> the document openly in Google Docs between now and >>> Sunday. We have divided our response into three >>> sections: >>> > > • Recognising and Accommodating Barriers >>> to Participation (Lead editor: Gimena del Rio) >>> > > • Best practice in governance and >>> mentorship (Lead editors: Alex Gil and Élika Ortega >>> > > • Best practice in inter-cultural language >>> use and communication (Lead editors: Daniel >>> O'Donnell and Øyvind Eide). >>> > > Each of the editors will be sharing a link to a >>> Google doc specifically for their section with the >>> list in the next couple of hours. In the document, >>> they will collect notes and points and examples (and >>> ask you to help with your ideas). On Sunday morning, >>> we will then lock the documents down and edit them >>> into a narrative (it is because of time pressure >>> that we will institute this lock down; this >>> lock-down and the lack of time for followup >>> consultation is also why, in the end, it will be >>> submitted as a document of the executive rather than >>> the SIG as a whole). >>> > > >>> > > In keeping with the GO::DH ethos, we encourage >>> people to contribute in whatever language you feel >>> most comfortable in and let the editors figure out >>> how to combine the bits and pieces. Our final >>> document will be submitted in three forms: an >>> original language narrative written in the languages >>> the editors feel most comfortable in (probably >>> English and Spanish for the most part), an >>> English-language, lingua franca translation for wide >>> dissemination, and, as Karina has indicated that her >>> first choice would be for Dutch, a Dutch-language >>> submission copy. >>> > > >>> > > Let me emphasis the extent to which we welcome >>> your ideas on these topics and invite you to >>> contribute to the formulation of our response. It >>> may also make sense to use the list as a way of >>> conversationally developing ideas under these topics >>> as well, so please feel free to contribute ideas >>> that way, as well, again in whatever language you >>> feel most appropriate. >>> > > >>> > > -dan >>> > > >>> > > _______________________________________________ >>> > > globaloutlookdh-l mailing list >>> > > globaloutlookdh-l@uleth.ca >>> mailto:globaloutlookdh-l@uleth.ca >>> > > >>> http://listserv.uleth.ca/mailman/listinfo/globaloutlookdh-l >>> > > >>> > > You are currently subscribed to this list in >>> NON-digest mode. This means you receive every >>> message as it is posted. >>> > > >>> > > If this represents too much traffic, you can >>> also subscribe in DIGEST mode. This sends out a >>> single email once a day containing the entire day's >>> postings. To change your settings go to >>> http://listserv.uleth.ca/mailman/options/globaloutlookdh-l >>> You can request a password reminder from this page >>> if you have forgotten yours. >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > _______________________________________________ >>> > > globaloutlookdh-l mailing list >>> > > globaloutlookdh-l@uleth.ca >>> mailto:globaloutlookdh-l@uleth.ca >>> > > >>> http://listserv.uleth.ca/mailman/listinfo/globaloutlookdh-l >>> > > >>> > > You are currently subscribed to this list in >>> NON-digest mode. This means you receive every >>> message as it is posted. >>> > > >>> > > If this represents too much traffic, you can >>> also subscribe in DIGEST mode. This sends out a >>> single email once a day containing the entire day's >>> postings. To change your settings go to >>> http://listserv.uleth.ca/mailman/options/globaloutlookdh-l >>> You can request a password reminder from this page >>> if you have forgotten yours. >>> > > >>> > > _______________________________________________ >>> > > globaloutlookdh-l mailing list >>> > > globaloutlookdh-l@uleth.ca >>> mailto:globaloutlookdh-l@uleth.ca >>> > > >>> http://listserv.uleth.ca/mailman/listinfo/globaloutlookdh-l >>> > > >>> > > You are currently subscribed to this list in >>> NON-digest mode. This means you receive every >>> message as it is posted. >>> > > >>> > > If this represents too much traffic, you can >>> also subscribe in DIGEST mode. This sends out a >>> single email once a day containing the entire day's >>> postings. To change your settings go to >>> http://listserv.uleth.ca/mailman/options/globaloutlookdh-l >>> You can request a password reminder from this page >>> if you have forgotten yours. >>> > >>> > >>> > _______________________________________________ >>> > globaloutlookdh-l mailing list >>> > globaloutlookdh-l@uleth.ca >>> mailto:globaloutlookdh-l@uleth.ca >>> > >>> http://listserv.uleth.ca/mailman/listinfo/globaloutlookdh-l >>> > >>> > You are currently subscribed to this list in >>> NON-digest mode. This means you receive every >>> message as it is posted. >>> > >>> > If this represents too much traffic, you can also >>> subscribe in DIGEST mode. This sends out a single >>> email once a day containing the entire day's >>> postings. To change your settings go to >>> http://listserv.uleth.ca/mailman/options/globaloutlookdh-l >>> You can request a password reminder from this page >>> if you have forgotten yours. >>> > _______________________________________________ >>> > globaloutlookdh-l mailing list >>> > globaloutlookdh-l@uleth.ca >>> mailto:globaloutlookdh-l@uleth.ca >>> > >>> http://listserv.uleth.ca/mailman/listinfo/globaloutlookdh-l >>> > >>> > You are currently subscribed to this list in >>> NON-digest mode. This means you receive every >>> message as it is posted. >>> > >>> > If this represents too much traffic, you can also >>> subscribe in DIGEST mode. This sends out a single >>> email once a day containing the entire day's >>> postings. To change your settings go to >>> http://listserv.uleth.ca/mailman/options/globaloutlookdh-l >>> You can request a password reminder from this page >>> if you have forgotten yours. >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> globaloutlookdh-l mailing list >>> globaloutlookdh-l@uleth.ca >>> mailto:globaloutlookdh-l@uleth.ca >>> http://listserv.uleth.ca/mailman/listinfo/globaloutlookdh-l >>> >>> You are currently subscribed to this list in >>> NON-digest mode. This means you receive every >>> message as it is posted. >>> >>> If this represents too much traffic, you can also >>> subscribe in DIGEST mode. This sends out a single >>> email once a day containing the entire day's >>> postings. To change your settings go to >>> http://listserv.uleth.ca/mailman/options/globaloutlookdh-l >>> You can request a password reminder from this page >>> if you have forgotten yours. >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> globaloutlookdh-l mailing list >>> globaloutlookdh-l@uleth.ca >>> mailto:globaloutlookdh-l@uleth.ca >>> http://listserv.uleth.ca/mailman/listinfo/globaloutlookdh-l >>> >>> You are currently subscribed to this list in >>> NON-digest mode. This means you receive every >>> message as it is posted. >>> >>> If this represents too much traffic, you can also >>> subscribe in DIGEST mode. This sends out a single >>> email once a day containing the entire day's >>> postings. To change your settings go to >>> http://listserv.uleth.ca/mailman/options/globaloutlookdh-l >>> You can request a password reminder from this page >>> if you have forgotten yours. >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> globaloutlookdh-l mailing list >>> globaloutlookdh-l@uleth.ca >>> mailto:globaloutlookdh-l@uleth.ca >>> http://listserv.uleth.ca/mailman/listinfo/globaloutlookdh-l >>> >>> You are currently subscribed to this list in NON-digest >>> mode. This means you receive every message as it is posted. >>> >>> If this represents too much traffic, you can also >>> subscribe in DIGEST mode. This sends out a single email >>> once a day containing the entire day's postings. To >>> change your settings go to >>> http://listserv.uleth.ca/mailman/options/globaloutlookdh-l >>> You can request a password reminder from this page if >>> you have forgotten yours. >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> globaloutlookdh-l mailing list >>> globaloutlookdh-l@uleth.ca mailto:globaloutlookdh-l@uleth.ca >>> http://listserv.uleth.ca/mailman/listinfo/globaloutlookdh-l >>> >>> You are currently subscribed to this list in NON-digest mode. This means you receive every message as it is posted. >>> >>> If this represents too much traffic, you can also subscribe in DIGEST mode. This sends out a single email once a day containing the entire day's postings. To change your settings go tohttp://listserv.uleth.ca/mailman/options/globaloutlookdh-l You can request a password reminder from this page if you have forgotten yours. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> globaloutlookdh-l mailing list >> globaloutlookdh-l@uleth.ca mailto:globaloutlookdh-l@uleth.ca >> http://listserv.uleth.ca/mailman/listinfo/globaloutlookdh-l >> >> You are currently subscribed to this list in NON-digest mode. >> This means you receive every message as it is posted. >> >> If this represents too much traffic, you can also subscribe >> in DIGEST mode. This sends out a single email once a day >> containing the entire day's postings. To change your settings >> go to >> http://listserv.uleth.ca/mailman/options/globaloutlookdh-l >> You can request a password reminder from this page if you >> have forgotten yours. >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> globaloutlookdh-l mailing list >> globaloutlookdh-l@uleth.ca mailto:globaloutlookdh-l@uleth.ca >> http://listserv.uleth.ca/mailman/listinfo/globaloutlookdh-l >> >> You are currently subscribed to this list in NON-digest mode. >> This means you receive every message as it is posted. >> >> If this represents too much traffic, you can also subscribe in >> DIGEST mode. This sends out a single email once a day containing >> the entire day's postings. To change your settings go to >> http://listserv.uleth.ca/mailman/options/globaloutlookdh-l You >> can request a password reminder from this page if you have >> forgotten yours. >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> globaloutlookdh-l mailing list >> globaloutlookdh-l@uleth.ca >> http://listserv.uleth.ca/mailman/listinfo/globaloutlookdh-l >> >> You are currently subscribed to this list in NON-digest mode. This means you receive every message as it is posted. >> >> If this represents too much traffic, you can also subscribe in DIGEST mode. This sends out a single email once a day containing the entire day's postings. To change your settings go tohttp://listserv.uleth.ca/mailman/options/globaloutlookdh-l You can request a password reminder from this page if you have forgotten yours. > > _______________________________________________ > globaloutlookdh-l mailing list > globaloutlookdh-l@uleth.ca > http://listserv.uleth.ca/mailman/listinfo/globaloutlookdh-l > > You are currently subscribed to this list in NON-digest mode. This means you receive every message as it is posted. > > If this represents too much traffic, you can also subscribe in DIGEST mode. This sends out a single email once a day containing the entire day's postings. To change your settings go to http://listserv.uleth.ca/mailman/options/globaloutlookdh-l You can request a password reminder from this page if you have forgotten yours.