Dear Domenico,
I completely agree with you. I particularly liked your paper "Geopolitica della conoscenza digitale. Dal web aperto all’impero di GAFAM."
I think the stakes are huge. I have myself many ongoing project on what knowledge will be in few years if we do not do something (and what we could do).
A would like to underline here a simple fact (I think a discussion about it here could be useful): I think our institutions are completely deaf about this problem. At UdeM, we are obliged to use Microsoft mail for our institutional email address (for some other universities it is Gmail), it is impossible to write without using Word (I always have problem when I refuse to give a docx file and I send instead an HTML). There are many things I cannot do with my Linux on the digital infrastructure of the university (for example: to review student applications for admission, we can **only** use Internet Explorer; our VPN does not work with Linux, there is only documentation for Windows and Mac, etc.). Our colleagues find normal to use Facebook or Google Hangout to stream their conferences... And when I say something about that everybody answers: "but it is easier, I do not have time to lose with your geek things".
I am as sconsolato as you
best
m
On 2019-11-23 12:20 PM, Domenico Fiormonte wrote:
Dear all,
as a DHer I was particularly struck by this report by Amnesty on surveillance giants:
https://www.amnesty.org/en/documents/pol30/1404/2019/en/
"But despite the real value of the services they provide, Google and Facebook’s platforms come at a systemic cost. The companies’ surveillance-based business model forces people to make a Faustian bargain, whereby they are only able to enjoy their human rights online by submitting to a system predicated on human rights abuse."
As some of you already know, I've been criticizing the political and social role of these platforms since long ago. And I'm increasingly wondering how the DH community - and especially our global community - can remain silent in the face of documented violations of human rights. Beacause this is exactly what's going on. It's not just about data.
Would make any sense to start a discussion here on how to respond as digital scholars to these (not anymore just epistemological or cultural) abuses?
Or should we just go on, using Google and Facebook as those and other documented abuses did not exist?
Sconsolatamente Vostro,
Domenico
globaloutlookdh-l mailing list globaloutlookdh-l@uleth.ca http://listserv.uleth.ca/mailman/listinfo/globaloutlookdh-l
You are currently subscribed to this list in NON-digest mode. This means you receive every message as it is posted.
If this represents too much traffic, you can also subscribe in DIGEST mode. This sends out a single email once a day containing the entire day's postings. To change your settings go to http://listserv.uleth.ca/mailman/options/globaloutlookdh-l You can request a password reminder from this page if you have forgotten yours.