the word you are looking for is : "infrastructure". If we are driven to use
the GAFAM services as scholars, it is just because we have no open,
efficient, sustainable, user-friendly, trustable alternative
infrastructure. The problem comes from higher : there is a notorious lack
of public investment at this level of the infrastructure supporting
scholarly work. There is investment beneath it (hard infrastructures like
network backbones, hosting facilities, computing power, semi-soft
infrastructures such as AAI), there is investment above (data management
infrastructures), but very few in the middle. How could we name this
intermediate level ? When we use Google and Facebook to write, discuss with
colleagues, share documents, collaborate, find and disseminate information,
this is communication in a scholarly context AKA "scholarly communication".
A lot of wonderful initiatives exist across the world that aim at giving to
the scholars the knowledge production tools they need, starting with Stylo
https://blog.sens-public.org/marcellovitalirosati/stylo/ , but they lack
sustainable funding.
That's why I agree with you when you say scholars should avoid using GAFAM
tools, but I disagree when it comes to lecturing them and making them feel
guilty for not shifting to something else. As an individual, I rely heavily
on Apple and Google infrastructure and I am not ashamed of it. I am just
waiting for a best alternative, meaning an open infrastructure that offers
the same level of service. Collectively, I am engaged into collective
efforts to make funders understand they have to invest in open scholarly
communication infrastructures, for the SSH, with OPERAS :
https://operas.hypotheses.org/ , for all disciplines with Invest in Open :
https://investinopen.org/ And I can tell you it is not an easy task. But we
need collective efforts - policies - as much as individual choices. And it
starts by understanding and making the policy makers understand that
communication tools and services for research are not commodities that can
be outsourced, but are strategic assets they should invest in, because
those tools and services literally shape the way research is done and
knowledge produced.
--
Pierre Mounier
OPERAS Coordinator (Community) -
http://operas-eu.org
OpenEdition Associate Director -
http://openedition.org
DOAB Co-Director -
http://doabooks.org
orcid.org/0000-0003-0691-6063
EHESS
54, boulevard Raspail
75006 Paris
Bureau/Office A-43-4
Mob. +33 (0)6 61 98 31 86
Skype : piotrr19701
Schedule a meeting with me :
https://doodle.com/pierremounier
On Sun, Nov 24, 2019 at 11:45 PM Bordalejo, Barbara
bab995@mail.usask.ca
wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> After the Cambridge Analytica scandal, I considered quitting some social
> media (starting with Facebook). I was torn between my need to communicate
> with family and friends living in far away countries (and some intensely
> active work groups I belong to), and the sheer immorality of the way in
> which these companies were using personal information to create profit or
> manipulate people. I weighed the pros and cons, and decided the price for
> leaving was too high at the time.
>
> As you know, there are other initiatives intending to replace Facebook
> (Minds, MeWe, WT social), each of them with its own problems, and none of
> them is popular enough, good enough, whatever enough.
>
> There is a serious argument in the Amnesty International post Domenico
> shared, which focuses mostly on the indiscriminate access to private data
> and how this can be prevented. Somehow, this doesn’t seem to be a
> determining factor for me (although I understand why it is for others).
> What I consider much more serious is the refusal from Facebook (and other
> social media giants) to deal with the spreading of misinformation and the
> rise of radical hate groups.
>
> Marcello also points out that we are being forced to use certain companies
> by our institutions and this shows how deeply the giants of Silicon Valley
> have taken root in all parts of our society (including those which should
> be independent and free). On top of that, these are services institutions
> have to pay for. When we use the “free” alternatives, we are using the
> exact same companies. Of course, “free” is never really free. I often tell
> my students that if they don’t have to pay for a service and they don’t see
> what they are being sold, they are the product.
>
> I agree that we should be writing about how to disengage from certain
> social media (I have various articles saved on how to quit those, but they
> were all written by well-intentioned journalists, not academics), what
> alternatives we might be using, or whether they are even necessary. Perhaps
> someone here might consider leading this work.
>
> BB
>
> P.S.: As I was writing this, I logged into Facebook to check on the name
> of one of the alternative social media platforms and I found a post from a
> colleague about the 160 anniversary of *The Origin of Species*. As a side
> note, he reminded me that it is now the tenth anniversary of my online
> variorum edition. Not all is evil about social media, and so I remain part
> of it for another day...
>
>
>
>
>
> On Nov 23, 2019, at 9:22 PM, O'Donnell, Dan
daniel.odonnell@uleth.ca
> wrote:
>
> I agree that we should be talking about this. I am increasingly seeing our
> community, which was the original "early adopters" now becoming the "early
> unadopters." But a) that's easier in the North and out you're wealthy than
> in the south or poor (what a surprise) and b) it requires some expertise
> and understanding of how, why, and what's involved. And indeed, university
> leadership doesn't seem to be treating this as seriously as they should.
>
> I'm increasingly thinking that this is the major challenge for us--i.e.
> Digitally knowledgeable humanists--to take up. I also don't think we are
> addressing it as seriously as it requires. We should be writing guides
> about how to disengage as seriously as we wrote them about engaging. We
> need to start talking about the societal costs we are seeing.
> ------------------------------
> *From:* globaloutlookdh-l
globaloutlookdh-l-bounces@uleth.ca on behalf
> of Marcello Vitali-Rosati
marcello@chiavedisvolta.org
> *Sent:* Sunday, November 24, 2019 6:41:40 AM
> *To:* globaloutlookdh-l, MailList
globaloutlookdh-l@uleth.ca
> *Subject:* Re: [globaloutlookDH-l] A Faustian bargain
>
> Dear Domenico,
>
> I completely agree with you. I particularly liked your paper
> "Geopolitica della conoscenza digitale. Dal web aperto all’impero di
> GAFAM."
>
> I think the stakes are huge. I have myself many ongoing project on what
> knowledge will be in few years if we do not do something (and what we
> could do).
>
> A would like to underline here a simple fact (I think a discussion about
> it here could be useful): I think our institutions are completely deaf
> about this problem. At UdeM, we are obliged to use Microsoft mail for
> our institutional email address (for some other universities it is
> Gmail), it is impossible to write without using Word (I always have
> problem when I refuse to give a docx file and I send instead an HTML).
> There are many things I cannot do with my Linux on the digital
> infrastructure of the university (for example: to review student
> applications for admission, we can **only** use Internet Explorer; our
> VPN does not work with Linux, there is only documentation for Windows
> and Mac, etc.). Our colleagues find normal to use Facebook or Google
> Hangout to stream their conferences... And when I say something about
> that everybody answers: "but it is easier, I do not have time to lose
> with your geek things".
>
> I am as sconsolato as you
>
> best
>
> m
>
>
>
> On 2019-11-23 12:20 PM, Domenico Fiormonte wrote:
> > Dear all,
> >
> > as a DHer I was particularly struck by this report by Amnesty on
> surveillance giants:
> >
> >
https://www.amnesty.org/en/documents/pol30/1404/2019/en/
> >
> >
> > "But despite the real value of the services they provide, Google and
> Facebook’s platforms come at a systemic cost. The companies’
> surveillance-based business model forces people to make a Faustian bargain,
> whereby they are only able to enjoy their human rights online by submitting
> to a system predicated on human rights abuse."
> >
> > As some of you already know, I've been criticizing the political and
> social role of these platforms since long ago. And I'm increasingly
> wondering how the DH community - and especially our global community - can
> remain silent in the face of documented violations of human rights.
> Beacause this is exactly what's going on. It's not just about data.
> >
> > Would make any sense to start a discussion here on how to respond as
> digital scholars to these (not anymore just epistemological or cultural)
> abuses?
> >
> > Or should we just go on, using Google and Facebook as those and other
> documented abuses did not exist?
> >
> > Sconsolatamente Vostro,
> >
> > Domenico
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > globaloutlookdh-l mailing list
> > globaloutlookdh-l@uleth.ca
> >
http://listserv.uleth.ca/mailman/listinfo/globaloutlookdh-l
> >
> > You are currently subscribed to this list in NON-digest mode. This means
> you receive every message as it is posted.
> >
> > If this represents too much traffic, you can also subscribe in DIGEST
> mode. This sends out a single email once a day containing the entire day's
> postings. To change your settings go to
>
http://listserv.uleth.ca/mailman/options/globaloutlookdh-l You can
> request a password reminder from this page if you have forgotten yours.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> globaloutlookdh-l mailing list
> globaloutlookdh-l@uleth.ca
>
http://listserv.uleth.ca/mailman/listinfo/globaloutlookdh-l
>
> You are currently subscribed to this list in NON-digest mode. This means
> you receive every message as it is posted.
>
> If this represents too much traffic, you can also subscribe in DIGEST
> mode. This sends out a single email once a day containing the entire day's
> postings. To change your settings go to
>
http://listserv.uleth.ca/mailman/options/globaloutlookdh-l You can
> request a password reminder from this page if you have forgotten yours.
> _______________________________________________
> globaloutlookdh-l mailing list
> globaloutlookdh-l@uleth.ca
>
http://listserv.uleth.ca/mailman/listinfo/globaloutlookdh-l
>
> You are currently subscribed to this list in NON-digest mode. This means
> you receive every message as it is posted.
>
> If this represents too much traffic, you can also subscribe in DIGEST
> mode. This sends out a single email once a day containing the entire day's
> postings. To change your settings go to
>
http://listserv.uleth.ca/mailman/options/globaloutlookdh-l You can
> request a password reminder from this page if you have forgotten yours.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> globaloutlookdh-l mailing list
> globaloutlookdh-l@uleth.ca
>
http://listserv.uleth.ca/mailman/listinfo/globaloutlookdh-l
>
> You are currently subscribed to this list in NON-digest mode. This means
> you receive every message as it is posted.
>
> If this represents too much traffic, you can also subscribe in DIGEST
> mode. This sends out a single email once a day containing the entire day's
> postings. To change your settings go to
>
http://listserv.uleth.ca/mailman/options/globaloutlookdh-l You can
> request a password reminder from this page if you have forgotten yours.
>